… Once I was in a balance between the sensory organs and the brain, today I see nothing except the brain. Once it was just like a receiver, today it appeared the great analyzer and talker of all visible or invisible events. One day I confined in Nature without any sense that I am confined. Nowadays I willfully confined me in the machine-reality. The mind-monkey once provoked me to think that somebody enslaved me and now it provoked me the same that I am subservient. Once the great monkey insisted me to worship somebody, and today it insisted me to worship the virtual word “machine based enlightenment”. God or whatsoever is absent, and none is there who can deserve worship for his grandiosity… Continue reading Mind-Monkey and the animated ignorance ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
Knowing about the Being is endless as endless the Acting is, as deathless the Edging and Ending is, and infinite the beginning of beginning is. Everything is “Acting” in here or somewhere or nowhere as a “Being”, and that is the infinite beginning of everything “Being”… Continue reading Oddments thoughts of “Being” and The Point of No Return ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
…The new reading of Aristotle influenced Thomas Kuhn to rethink about the systematic approaches of modern science. It drives him to think about the narrow-line from where science detached itself to think or reconsider other knowledge disciplines with positive postures. Modern methodical approaches where any part of thought if appeared anomalous or mismatched with observation and experiment, the science community instant leave this thought, and without giving a chance that we should reconsider our thought by taking a new approach to it. This rigidity as Karl Popper thinks inevitable for science if it wants to ground its theory with a pragmatic dataset and plausible logical sequences. However, Kuhn’s designed his thought in reverse. He believes such stereotype approach make science non-realistic and it might be a practical loss for science itself… Continue reading The Paradigm of Normal Science ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… What we see these are not enough, but what we feel when we see “these”, it might be more precious to realize the real essence of life. A real object always hides its originality as like Basho’s old pond. The duty of an artist could be there, he should jump into the pond to discover the hidden treasures by using his inner visionary. This is the spiritual journey of an artist… Continue reading When the image is born (Part-4) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Only the geek knows cloggy hot days will back
just after the banishment of dried burflowers.
I hug my woman’s chin to remembering this.
Replacement of things is eternal… Cloggy sweat will appear again in my woman’s thin chin
The pigtailed burflower will dry by oozing its last raindrop.
Beauty is just for a funeral… Continue reading Wintry moments ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… The sunny clouds are comin’ and goin’ like lonely thunder.
From where it comin’? Goin’ where?, I ask myself
Croak croak…, the rainy toad answered me by seated in its toadstool./ … Multicolored butterflies flying surround the tea leaves.
From where they are comin’ with these multicolors? Goin’ where?
I ask myself over again,
Croak croak…, the rainy toad leaps on the pond to its toadstool./ … From where this chatterbox arrives? Now goin’ where?
I ask myself by seeing the jumping toad,
Torrential rainfall begins at this moment, to stop me… Continue reading Momentary talks ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… This is a new world where images of amity often collide with animosity. The fragrance of love and attachment totters by confusion and soon it collides with hatred. No morals are eternal here that could be treated as a reward for honesty; instead, they collide with immoral within the twinkling of eyes. Fairy-looking happiness walks like a toddler and dash with tragic misfortune. Power collides with the fear of losing power. Divinity threatened and busy to wrestle with no-divinity. The life-giver atoms could collide at any moment by the life-taking reverses. We are living in a pretentious world where everything is looking fine-tuned and over certain, but they fragmented by pieces when collides with uncertainty rings the bell. The essence of super-human is a faint shadow and soon replaced by the ghostly non-human… Khaled Hafez might realize the collided duality and tries to engrave all this contrast in his canvas, so seer can feel something quickly shifted and replaced by one another, and time is none but a character of ambiguous disorder between signs. His animated paintistry echoed the truth with pop art fancy… Continue reading The Hyperreal world of Khaled Hafez ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Vermeer’s painting indicates real things and their relation with human get fractured or broken when a painter pick them for his canvas. This is called implicit silence that may deserve seer’s involvement and his conscious connotation so he can associate him to read the meaning of the real things in art, and as well as the difference it makes from the images of extant reality. Art denies reality and the artist always try to paint what his visual cortex told him to paint. An artist denies the order of things that might make by the humans, and the system now tried to dominate him by this. Artist’s rebellion against the order of things can only save his soul to the ordained discipline of life, where he tried to reverse the order of things through his artistry, as Cubist and Surrealist did and to the consequence Abstract and even the Realistic artform tried to do it often… Let come to the point, how a seer can read the reality a painting object reflexes? How he can differentiate his usual reality sense when he stands in front of the painting canvas with a dizzy mind? Let make the question bit difficult, how he faces the abstraction of life and real objects that are now very frequent in painting canvas? The answer of all these questions is not a ready-made set. We cannot say what he feels that should be treated his judgment to the artwork and rest is immaterial… Continue reading When the image is born (Part-3) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… every visible thing reminds the muse of invisible ‘bit or dot’, where they associate according to their will to destroy and rebuild things over again. Every ‘thing’ has gonna in the void when death appeared and all these every ‘thing’ can revive from the out of nothing.
The Hegelian phrasing might be appropriate here to realize the meaning of life; that is, —there is something always remains to be waiting in nothingness, something remain in the complete void, to bring back the whole picture of reality over again. Creation itself is transcendental and mysterious in this way, so why not art. Maybe that’s why Kandinsky tried to consider art a spiritual silence of creation and destruction. He thinks it doesn’t matter where an artist sitting on the apex of any horizontal line of the triangle, but it does matter what he sees or feel in his ‘within’ by sitting there… Continue reading When the image is born (Part_2) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… ‘Life’s appearance and omission in the world, its presence or absence from the surface, all these are nothing but an illusion of our dizzy mind. Images have born and dissolved into the surface but the essence of images remains even after the annihilation happened. This essence might be the prehistoric element that never dies and that’s why images are born over to repeat the tiresome jingle of life. Every new image is the resonance of old images; every newish venture somehow linked with the prehistoric ventures happened in the remote past. Images are the repeater of that ambiguity where nothing has gonna vanished for forever. Both poets painted the same imagery in a different context. They deliver the same message but the ways of contrasting images are different…This is the landing zone of art ‘where everything is seemingly over, where everything looked as if they omit in vain and none is there who can whisper that he exists to talk with the silence.’ Without this poetry cannot get its end and painting can never be born… Continue reading When the image is born (Part-1) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Any protest against the systematic exploitation of peoples’ right, it must burst some bad smile with true vulgarity; except for this, it cannot shake the system where rosy faces are hungry to smell the ‘deodorized dog shit’, to think it a fragrance… The boys who were in the dreamy movement and who were not there due to the adverse ambiance, a majority of them will be lost in course of time; few among of them remain after this, they will have a chance to rebuild the world for upcoming descendants. The ‘robust few’ will appear as a leader for the future generation. How they achieve it by living on today’s unpleasant ambiance?—the question is vital, but today’s protester must find the answer through his self-learning… Continue reading Hi, Do you have a license? School kids charged adults for safe Bangladesh ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Hostility was coming as a death angel to the idler who was eager to free his married brother taking his burden for the rest of his life. Mental asylum was might be the only place where Vincent can protect his humanity and his passionate love for yellow and blue. Nowadays we know Vincent’s asylum days has appeared a boon to him where he painted his masterpieces one-after-another with enthusiastic passion and steadiness. Asylum is not a tranquil place for human beings but Vincent made it tranquil for him where nobody can tease him and nor anybody is there who left him to think that he is an unfit or impossible companion. Society treat madness a disease and Vincent had guts to think he needs space to rethink about this madness; his days on asylum helped him to remove the dreadful fear that he is not alone in this world, there are people who are hallucinated like him… Continue reading In remembrance of Vincent ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Philosophy is not science because it begins from where science has ended with its apparently proven condition. Alike philosophy has nothing to do with religion when it followed the same fashion and gripped conclusion. Philosophy is the utterance of disagreement; a penetration, that is, something has remained in the conclusion for further refutation… Philosophy is for chaos, not for the peaceful settlement of decided propositions. Those who are afraid of chaos they are the believer; who are fearless they might be the seeker of truth… Truth in religion means settlement. It means reverse in philosophy; and that is, —disagreement… Continue reading Thoughts on essential philosophy ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… leaders of Israelite are narcissus. Jewish priests count others according to their own suffering. They think other human races hate Jewish because the amorphous God has chosen them as a preserver of true scripture and prophethood. They think Mount Sinai or Gabal Musa is their own property; other claimants have stolen it from the Jews scriptures, and they cannot tolerate Jewish due to the shameful act they have done before… Israelite will stay in Israel at any cost and if he lives in other countries, he will live there according to his own segregation and seclusion. He will take care of himself and will take more care to armor his residence with barbed wire… This inner enticement makes the Jewish community stubborn and conservative. They marked Israel as the only heaven for them in today’s hostile world. Israelite in all over the world treats this land their heavenly child who deserve caring. They don’t hesitate to take one-sighted eyes for caring this land. Israelite strangely still marked them self-sufficing when they are talking about Israel. The world’s access is prohibited in this barbed wire world… Continue reading Israelite – the hangover is yet not over ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Anyway, Indians are more specific in that context. They treat this position as awareness and separate it from consciousness. Consciousness is the experience of awareness-driven actions; a conscious act happened when creation generates the material world or its agents throughout the composition of awareness. That means consciousness is “created” but awareness possessed uncreated state… This material world is the game of inclusion and exclusion. Indivisible uncreated played a vital rule there to make the corporeal agents conscious, so humanlike agents can feel they are the phenomenon of uncreated. That’s why “divisible created” means inclusion and exclusion of indivisible awareness-driven elements. Awareness is such element what Tononi tried to mean in his theory by facing the abusive charges from his fellows… Continue reading When consciousness speaks ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… We were once the member of suchlike common; nobody possessed it but everybody has its own right to use this according to the demand. The economy of this common tried to mean that… everything on this planet is created and evolved in such way so that physical agents can occupy each other through the common sharing principle. Charles Darwin once named it “the economy of nature”; nobody is the owner or caretaker of this economy, rather Nature itself the caretaker and rule-maker of this common sharing principles. The whole notion sounds awkward today, but it was normal on those days when we were literally the forager, have used to live a healthy life through hunting, breeding, and gossiping… We might remember this before goes further on thinking about the common. We are often reeling on the fence thinking that how we can utilize maximum Natural resources by taking the minimalist ways!.. Is it Nature a property for humans? Why do we think like this? Who gives us the authority to treat Nature and its agents a property for us, only to ensure our own wellbeing?… The answer might be critical because indiscreet manipulation of common has already blurred the picture with dubious destruction… Continue reading Death of “common” ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Maybe it sounds weird but anxiety and displeasure is the mother of philosophy. Not only Heidegger, as well Hegel, Nietzsche and many other great original thinkers are critical on the logitimacy of “being”. They criticize the logicians who use any particular point of history to understand the beginning and beingness of the “being”. That means they tried to legitimate the beginning problem of “being” by pick some historical event for this. The risk is there, that is, we can consider this logification of history an ultimate solution for the original questions of “being” or the beginning of “being”. How all this begins and how “being” has maintained its beginnings through the continual process of appearance and disappearance of things in the world? —suchlike question lead us to stumble on the history; it provoked us grounded the historical point a fact to solve the unknowable state of original beginnings of the “being”… Continue reading Duel with language and the way Slavoj Žižek encoded Heidegger (Third Segment) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Today it sounds prattle and false but it was the language of our predecessors on those primordial or ancient days of human civilization. Might be they were comfortable with it and understood it with such an ease that sounds weird in today’s techno qua language. I think, it not a surprise when ecologist Suzanne Simard explained her fascinating experience about how she comes to believe on this, —yes, in healthy forest trees can talk each other, they share their pain and joy each other and show their cooperative attitude when they transmit signals to each other. It now a scientific outcome through bit experimentation where she covered seedling plants in a forest with some carbonized plastic bags. Rest story is amazing since to the vibration of tress she recorded in her Geiger Detector. The sound heard amazing when Suzanne shared it in her last TED Talk. All must be a cheerful event for the scientists who keep busy them to search the physics behind every creation… Continue reading The tales of unspoken trees ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Every unspoken state of “being” prolonged the uncanny silence and human-like “being” cannot resist this, nor he is capable to escape from it. Dealing own existence with instinctive animalism might easy for all other “being” but the same thing is difficult for a human “being”. Humans can talk through language where they try to mean their beingness by this. Language is Nature to other animals. It helps them to survive in Nature oriented environment. Humans differentiate them by escaped from the Natural animalism where language itself the part of yonder isms. This separation is the first dialectical step for human beings, and now he bound to express his beingness through the dialectical language that he got from the unknown source. Language is the only medium that can speak for him, despite the threat that is, —every spoken word rewarded the “being” suffering pain and contradiction… Why the interception happened when “being and language” coexists to make a connection between them? —this question insists Žižek differ with Heidegger… Continue reading Duel with language and the way Slavoj Žižek encoded Heidegger (Second Segment) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… It might have appeared a fault-line to Žižek when he dissects Heidegger. We dwell and duel with a paternal neurotic and that is language. Heidegger’s peaceful home bring the motherly fragrance to us, but this home is not a comfort zone for “being”. Žižek hired Lacan for the reminder and that is, —this home is paternal. It behaves like a sturdy father who is very persuasive to his attitude. This ambiguity makes this home dialectical and as well the reality of “being”. Heidegger’s searching for originary beingness of the “being” in that context might the Utopia, it resonance poesis and tried to hide it in the antiquity. According to Žižek’s interpretation, Heidegger appeared there an escapist. Is it? If we want a plausible answer, it must be necessary for us to follow Heidegger’s explanation (with an enclosure of Hegelian discourse) before coming to any decision about the great mind of philosophy… Continue reading Duel with language and the way Slavoj Žižek encoded Heidegger (First Segment) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… On the other hand, the philosophical problem of unintended extension of ‘originary’ led Heidegger to think about such state where ‘origin’ contained its own ‘ontology’ and ‘throw’ itself over again. Anyway, it unable to answer any question about its ontological beingness. As we can say (not literally, just for argument’s sake) God (if we imagine God as ‘prime mover’ in Aristotle’s context) himself is unable to answer the question: —why He is God or how He exists as a variable to generate his beingness which moves everything for the creation. Because which is uncreated it cannot answer any question through ‘itself’. As Heidegger’s Dasein cannot answer why it Dasein. Like this manner, Putnam faces the basic analytical problem of the meaning in semantics when it means ‘something’ original and origin… Continue reading Meaning of the meaning – Heidegger in Hilary Putnam’s case ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… Heidegger might be the dare mentor who trained us how to read our own ‘self’ without philosophizing it anymore. More we philosophize anything (in any light of discussion) the more we trapped ourselves in the nominative meaning. Philosophy is not a nominative ‘meaning’, rather it could be non-nominative, an action which leads us to embrace the real ‘being’. Philosophical idioms are the barrier to touch the ground where ‘being’ has ‘thrown’ itself by using its own ‘is’. This Gestellation of ‘being’ as a ‘thing’ is non-ontological. It can be questioned but never be answerable… Philosophy is not an answer of ‘being’ (or whatever it is), rather the restless refutation and Destruktion of answers through new questions. That is Heidegger, and that could be the ‘essence’ of ‘what he meant by the philosophy’. If we realize it, philosophy can guide science; otherwise, the death of philosophy is inevitable… Continue reading Martin Heidegger and the ‘Destruktion’ of philosophy ⇒ Kirno Sohochari