Killing instinct is the brainchild of our lethal intention that it’s necessary to survive in the hostile world. We ever not able to forget, -the journey of human race was not an easy matter in remote past. Our competitors had great killing power and we were feeble in the milieu. Invention of weapon was necessary to survive and luckily we survived by increasing the imaginary capacities of our coiled jelly bun. The size of the braincell should treat the major leap of advancement to the progress and equally regress. The great jelly bun helped us to survive and on the opposite hide the truth that one day this body-machine was feeble to kill but it can kill now the entire life form by the moment!
We invent weapons and explore thousands killing techniques to preserve our self-interest for power play and domination over the other. It was exigent in the remote past, because we were in fight to the hostile animal’s body-machine and equally the dreadful nature in jungle and cave, but nowadays killing is pointlessly indispensable to us; because, we’re now the enemy of everything existed in this world, and even be the enemy of our own. We use the body as a killing machine to kill our homogeneous.
Killing is a deadly artful activity and we the master on this art by the millions years journey. It doesn’t matter that a pedestrian is floating on the road to serve the “self-interest” of his gun-shooter. Who could say, the stabbed and gunshot-man not think the opposite of stabs and shoots his rivals in chance. Maybe he had the same plan before killed by his rivals. I got some relief soon after the moment of murder to think the consequence.
This body-machine isn’t for birth or else the confirmation of death; it works for balancing the curvature that killing is equally important as important life is.
Thousands observers are thought the same as like to me I believe, even though we failed to show the humanity to protest the killer on that day’s of open murder. Anyway, when killing or murdering be branded for “mitigate the self-interest and rivalry” humanity as well muzzled by the threat.
I’m not feeling guilt for this and if anybody killed me at future by the way, I think other has no reason to blame his own for this. It’s a collective passiveness of the mass and I’m not out of the fence. The great human race decided to be passive on the massive terror of mass or individual murder when the society is passing its time by seeing the “larger than life” action or thriller movies and military parades.
I have to passive on the arrangement of war, ethnic cleansing, terrorist gunfire, bombing and am the threat of nuclear weapons. It’s emergent for the state to inactivate and muzzled me on the moment of personal and mass murder, because the self-interest of movie director and the armored legion’s depends on my passiveness to the killing events.
Arms trading are profitable business concern, so I have to passive and giving taxes for sake of the national interest; it will secure my interest to keep safe by the armed battalion when the killing mission happened on the busy street and maybe the border of Syria, Myanmar and elsewhere. Humiliation of humanity is the part of our life and it’s obnoxious to feel guilty and be repentant for this.
The armed battalion, crime patrol, blind deity of justice, the criminology experts and hopefully the United Nations are dutiful to pay over the burden of my passiveness during gunshot, stabbing or maybe the massive bombing in elsewhere of the world. Yeah, I have no repentance for the event happened in front of me few days ago. I’m not liable for this, because everything in here is pre-designed, pre-manufactured and pre-equipped by the dexterous safeguard of the state.
Other animals are ignorant about the man-made definition of killing and its moral standard, but we have no chance to ignore it, and that’s the ethical burden for us.
Dear readers, I’m not repentant for the murder happened in front of thousands and me. Despite this I’m bit disturbed to think that, why do we people act like innocent and regretful after seeing the bloodshed event. It is scientific man! Why we’re trying to show the false empathy to wear the cloak of humanity? It has nothing to do on the emergent moment of self-gratification.
This body-machine isn’t for birth or else the confirmation of death; it works for balancing the curvature that killing is equally important as important life is. This body-machine is responsible to breeding the human until death, and will wake up on time to kill the tiny ants or violent animals and be the homogeneous he dislikes and preferred thorny to his own “interest”. Killing psychology is congenital by birth and it’s absurd to refuse this for humanity’s sake. We have to remember this, humanity doesn’t work when the killing machine started its mission of stabbing, firing, bombing to the person or be the mass people.
However, it doesn’t mean that human race getting better progress against the other. Our progression on the contrary is pulling us to the regression.
It’s true that human body-machine is feeble in killing to compare the other animal; even the homogeneous ape members (gorilla, orangutans, chimpanzees etc.) are far advanced on this capacity. The cat species have great killing instinct for its sharp teeth, nails and quick movement. Watery shark and crocodiles are simply astounding to their killing instinct. Venomous snake and the muscled anaconda is simply amazing to bite or squeezing the rivals. The bird species know how to fly high and soon arrived to the ground to catch the victims, and even the tiny insects (ants, bees etc.) have inextricable capacity of stings and killing.
The body-machine of these creatures effectively made them a perfect killing machine. They use the machine for food hunting and self-protection to the enemy. The animosity, rivalry, hostility in animal kingdom depended on the attitude of other animal (even if it’s human). The sympathy and morality simply depended on the basic rules of hunting, eating, copulating, breeding and protecting the self by the lethal weapons they have achieved in the race of evolution. This simplification makes them free to carry the burden of screwed contradictions and dialectics of human life.
Human race bit different there. Our curiosity and knowledge, invention and application, our language and culture and the communication skill makes different definition of life. We’re separate among the many, because our jelly bun can imagine and think a lot than any other creature. The happiness and sorrows, complexity and contradiction, order and discipline, dialogue and arguments and many diversified signs of human life is not similar to the other. Our inquisitive imaginations and thoughtful actions or the emotional expressions are utterly different to the other, even the genetically similar animals.
The human animal made its own definition of animalism and we could analyze and change it by the progression of time. If we consider the natural evolution, anybody could say that killing is moral and essential for him to survive. On the opposite, human does never says like this after taking a marathon race to achieve the self-declared title of “the best creature of the earth”. Other animals are ignorant about the man-made definition of killing and its moral standard, but we have no chance to ignore it, and that’s the ethical burden for us.
Human body-machine is revolves on its own dilemma now. The animal species failed to advance further by killing the massive to win over the race. Their jelly bun failed to convert its curious capacity to persistently increasing the knowledge as human does. However, it doesn’t mean that human race getting better progress against the other. Our progression on the contrary is pulling us to the regression. Regression for what, yeah, the regression of moral contradiction that yet we do not avoid the necessity of killing and in the same way cannot accept or adapt it to the body-machine.
Curiosity’s the mother of all knowledge. Our genetic ancestors successfully survived due to the curiosity of unveiling the nature’s mystery by thoughtful imagination. That was the beginning of natural science and the birth of communication through language as well. Human race could exchange the language on a great and diversified extent than the other species. This capacity helped them to makes their own order of existence to define and exploit it to the order.
Curiosity is great and equally jeopardy when you driven it to serve your own purpose only. The natural history of human race getting progress to kill the coherent beat of fight, struggle and survive we usually have seen in nature. The price is enormous than the fear and ignorance we used to live at remote past. Progression to the enlightenment is meaningless if it does fail to associate the coherent beats still existed in nature, and probably it will extinct very soon.
It’s our own fault that we define the progress of human race to divide it by the savage and civilized era, whereas we be also divided the pattern of killing as well. The civilized and enlightened killer of modern time is a cold-blooded killer. This killer is a thousand times wild and furious than the savage. We tried to stop the cold-blooded killer now for our own sake by forgetting the truth that, killers are everywhere and we be the member of this enlightened “Ku Klux Klan”.
We enlightened our body-machine by the new definition of blind supremacy, aggressive nationalism, master nordicism and the religious domination. All these are weapon we used to kill the enemies we considered savage or unfit to live in our enlightened hub. “Savage” was the wrong word and we always deliberately picked it to write down the history of human race. The psychological impact of the word was great and now we rate the price to seeing the new immersion of “Ku Klux Klan” shortly after.
The pathetic thing of this immersion is that most probably we are more savage than ever to our own society-members and the decadence nature. Our hardship to the ignorance-cleansing now turned a threat of our own extinction. We tried to solve it by raising the confronting animosity under the definition of progressive and regressive, where the definition is correlative due to the conflicts between individual sects of wisdom-seeker. Each group thinks their wisdom is perfect for ignorance cleansing and other is wrong to the definition. A militant wisdom grasped the human-mind to provoke it violent reactionaries, even the influential scientific wisdom being militant now to define other “ignorant”.
Progression to the enlightenment is meaningless if it does fail to associate the coherent beats still existed in nature, and probably it will extinct very soon.
Scientific progress truly plucked the root of ignorance and consistently cutting the commonsense to the parallel. Knowledge is menace than the ignorance when it tries to be impassive to its own fault and transfer these to the other on chance. I know smart people now enjoying the advancement of artificial intelligence and thrilled to imagine their next future at Mars, but all we forget that it could not cure us from the déjà vu’s of killing syndrome. The ingrown killing instinct rose over time and the progress of sedative techno-based society is the foremost reason for this.
We’re dreaming to land on another planet with all these simulacra of kills, murder, dominance, suppression and the offensive attitude to the ascertained unknown enemies! Okay. It doesn’t mean anything to the smart inventor who thinks he’s not liable for the application of this invention. Application depends on the moral standard and pragmatic interest of the person and be the society. Perhaps he’s right but when the invention going to the alarming threat for many, he should have some guts to protest it. Dehumanization of knowledge is the breeding land of implacable killing addiction and we agreed or not the addiction grows to the parallel of scientific progress.
I hope the large numbers of conscientious scientist at least agreed to the point that all’s for human; if human race getting in risk, what would be the success of this thoughtful action, experiment or invention? Maybe I’m foolish in my thought, but the number (conscious and conscientious scientist) is reducing a lot today. The scientific community takes of a one-sighted path that they have nothing to do with the bloody-shaggy people and politicians, except to reduce the burden by inventing artificial human-robot or sent them to the other planet if possible. We started living on the high peak of robotic society and ascertained our future enemies to fight, kill, murder, torture before the journey.
Knowledge is menace than the ignorance when it tries to be impassive to its own fault and transfer these to the other on chance.
Knowledge is power and we’re literally practicing the apathetic verb to ignore the billion numbers of less intelligent, less advanced, less educate, less nourished ordinary people in the world. These people live on the less developed zones and even the ghetto or territorial areas of developed nations. We’re flying on the sci-fi and a great majority of the world now wait for the bombardment to wipe out from the landscape before we leave this planet with our artificially super talented robot-human! Perhaps we’re more sensitive to the artificial simulacrum than the original!
The funniest thing of this hitchhike is assuredly lying behind the veil. Our imagery sci-fi still reflect the same old moralities of fights, kills, murders and demolished envy to the fairy opponents. The smart sci-fi readers forget the basic that this natural universe is bigger than his limit but his thinking is narrow than the big, -in spite of the ontological leap to the artificial intelligence. The smart progressive thinks to dominate something but he’s not deft to think about the possibilities of peaceful handshaking and coexistence to the other. The loss of natural origin cuts the basis that, examine your thoughtful outcomes on philosophy’s ground before to apply it.
Killing is a deadly artful activity and we the master on this art by the millions years journey.
Science increases our knowledge and evenly decreases our sympathetic coherence to the other. We were natural savage at past and now the artificial savage who can kill anybody by disguise his notorious intention of killing. I think we can find the real killer in the lab. Modern laboratory is a knowledge archive and on the opposite it is the killing achieve. Our scientific knowledge and techno intelligence lost its own nexus that every invention has its own fate, and presumption of the fate as well necessary before to apply it. Usually we try to forget the truth but I don’t know why!
It’s not fair to deny the superior responsibility by transferring it to the greedy politician’s shoulder always. Favoring the killing instinct by excuse of knowledge seeking and tried to prove me innocent is as well a crime to the humanity; our humanitarian group strangely forgets this during the protest of mass killing or criminal activities in the world.
Every action has its own chain-reaction. We create new disease by the action and then try to resolve this by creating another new disease. We try to control the pace of nature by the utilitarian action and now try to control the decadent nature by creating another utilitarian action. I think time’s up to remove the mask of mimic-humanity. We needed to question our action and knowledge and consider our fault to stand on the real ground of killing and humanly actions.
The superior think tanks of modern civilization needed this utmost, otherwise, the artificial robots will take the revenge at one day in negation of humiliating exploitation to them, because, nobody in this universe wanted to be mimicked by the other.