… Vermeer’s painting indicates real things and their relation with human get fractured or broken when a painter pick them for his canvas. This is called implicit silence that may deserve seer’s involvement and his conscious connotation so he can associate him to read the meaning of the real things in art, and as well as the difference it makes from the images of extant reality. Art denies reality and the artist always try to paint what his visual cortex told him to paint. An artist denies the order of things that might make by the humans, and the system now tried to dominate him by this. Artist’s rebellion against the order of things can only save his soul to the ordained discipline of life, where he tried to reverse the order of things through his artistry, as Cubist and Surrealist did and to the consequence Abstract and even the Realistic artform tried to do it often… Let come to the point, how a seer can read the reality a painting object reflexes? How he can differentiate his usual reality sense when he stands in front of the painting canvas with a dizzy mind? Let make the question bit difficult, how he faces the abstraction of life and real objects that are now very frequent in painting canvas? The answer of all these questions is not a ready-made set. We cannot say what he feels that should be treated his judgment to the artwork and rest is immaterial… Continue reading When the image is born (Part-3) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… every visible thing reminds the muse of invisible ‘bit or dot’, where they associate according to their will to destroy and rebuild things over again. Every ‘thing’ has gonna in the void when death appeared and all these every ‘thing’ can revive from the out of nothing.
The Hegelian phrasing might be appropriate here to realize the meaning of life; that is, —there is something always remains to be waiting in nothingness, something remain in the complete void, to bring back the whole picture of reality over again. Creation itself is transcendental and mysterious in this way, so why not art. Maybe that’s why Kandinsky tried to consider art a spiritual silence of creation and destruction. He thinks it doesn’t matter where an artist sitting on the apex of any horizontal line of the triangle, but it does matter what he sees or feel in his ‘within’ by sitting there… Continue reading When the image is born (Part_2) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari
… What makes things reflexive? What provokes it to come out in the world? Above all, what makes things automaton? These questions are vital for the observer who exercises his sensual network and cognitive kingdom to find the plausible answer at best he could. However, it is not necessary for the things examined their existence through above-mentioned questions. Things have their own automaton becoming in the ‘what is this (?)’ state, —as for why (?); the answer could be, —as for action, and as for make the world real to the observer. Things are there because of that they can act… Continue reading Something is present ‘there’ ⇒ Kirno Sohochari