Thoughts on essential philosophy ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

… Philosophy is not science because it begins from where science has ended with its apparently proven condition. Alike philosophy has nothing to do with religion when it followed the same fashion and gripped conclusion. Philosophy is the utterance of disagreement; a penetration, that is, something has remained in the conclusion for further refutation… Philosophy is for chaos, not for the peaceful settlement of decided propositions. Those who are afraid of chaos they are the believer; who are fearless they might be the seeker of truth… Truth in religion means settlement. It means reverse in philosophy; and that is, —disagreement… Continue reading Thoughts on essential philosophy ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Monster tales and the fictional reality (Second Part) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Human race really passed a fictional time in the remotest dawn of Indian civilization. There was a clear difference amid the Human, Animal and the Rakshasa, but the exchange was open to all. The three musketeers frequently met each other for lovemaking and battling. Yonder era has sunk down according to the pace of time. Those valiant warriors and genius artists have omitted to the earth. They were public celebrities at that time, was being epical due to the dramatic events of their life. All they appeared on the earth according to the law of fictional reality, and later omitted in the same stream of epical reality. They omitted but left the messages of varicolored exchanges between the Human, Animal, and Rakshasa… Continue reading Monster tales and the fictional reality (Second Part) ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Debate dilemma: the Good the Bad and the Ugly ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

However, Krauss is always vivid in any talk or debate, but is it everything? Is it sufficient to fulfill the ideal condition of debate? Does confident jargons and logical approach help listener to think deeply about controversial fact between theism and atheism? Is it helpful for listener considers the conflict of religion and science in light of scientific progress or discourse? I questioned mine many times after watch the debate and it reminds me Bimal Krishna Matilal’s interpretation about debating methods in ancient India… Continue reading Debate dilemma: the Good the Bad and the Ugly ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Geminated mind or Fictional Reality ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Dear Mother, once you warned me about to remember the difference between Reality and Fiction, once you forbade me to believe in fiction, and I know why you forbade me to doing this…/Yeah, reality is simple when anybody takes to decide it simple that, he will never think of it further and just played to it as it is. Maybe the policy is best to survive but difficult to play, as I’m yet not able to play it very well. Pardon me mother, reality is still enigmatic to me with its reality and I’m walking along the maze to remember your lucid face… which perhaps the only reality that is non-fictional. Continue reading Geminated mind or Fictional Reality ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

The dizzy knowledge seeker ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

Khidr was smiling to hear Moses and then replied, “You have guessed many to answer the simple question. That means we know very little about everything happening in the surface. So far you observed, as far the answer is. As far you answer, so far the knowing is. So far you see the sea, as far you can tell about it, rest is lie behind the mystery, where you could guess a lot but not confidently claim that you know the exact. To me it is the signage that, we’re flying and traveling in an unlimited ocean and dipped our beaks to take little drop of water… Continue reading The dizzy knowledge seeker ⇒ Kirno Sohochari

“How many “selfs” make a “Self”?” ⇒ Larry Glover on Wild Resiliency Blog

We now stand on the modern perspective with the same old question of our fate that, “which is happened after dooms of the body-machine?” Today we’re more curious to deal the “true self” rather the “soul”. What the “Self” is and what do we wanted to mean by “Selfness” or be the “Selflessness”? Question is hypothetical but fact is realistic. We need to dig it for our own interest to understand the relation between the bodied world and the incessantly germinate universe… Continue reading “How many “selfs” make a “Self”?” ⇒ Larry Glover on Wild Resiliency Blog

Absolute Truth and the Truth Paradox (for the nonce a final part) ⇒ Bloggers on debate

The working-method of science is not relative to truthfulness. Confidence that “my theory is true” and the condition of the theory (as Hawking mentioned in his book) are quite different. Scientific philosophy is impersonal to the fact, and experimental to the reality. The pragmatism of scientific theory could never work in deductive way what philosophy (and theology also) can do in great extent./… We want to relate science (in extent of truth-paradox and true God) only for three reasons: i. to know something evidential facts of the material world and the body-biology, ii. to infer the evolution process on solid ground of natural selection and genetic evolution (includes the DNA sequencing), iii. to materialize the metaphysical ideas by including the de facto approval of -what reality has to be and what it is. Continue reading Absolute Truth and the Truth Paradox (for the nonce a final part) ⇒ Bloggers on debate